I work as a web product engineer for various web products at Mozilla, including several platforms designed to serve Mozilla’s contributor community. I team up with product stakeholders to design products and I work with implementation experts to build them. I’m responsible for achieving vision.
This role gives me a good perspective on what we say we want to do and how we do it. And I see an opportunity for us to increase the scope and ambition of both in our contributor tools efforts.
In September, I collaborated with David Boswell and Chris More on a proposal explaining the opportunity. Since then, inspired by great conversations at the 2013 Mozilla Summit, Mozillians have discussed and converged on a few foundational definitions that will inform our subsequent conversations about contributors. Simultaneously, the proposal (which has been in Google Documents until now) has slowly made its way around the organization by way of document invites.
Since there seems to be some interest in it, and since invite-only isn’t really the Mozilla way, I’m sharing the most recent version of the proposal here.
Please note: This is a proposal, it’s not a plan. If you support it, your advocacy will help! If not, your challenging questions will help, too!
Contributor Tools Program
Definition and Scope
The Contributor Tools program builds and maintains systems that connect contributors to contribution opportunities and helps keep them actively involved. These systems serve the entire project and are not specific to a given functional area or product. This includes tools that:
- Offer people both online and offline ways to get involved with the project (such as a call-to-action on http://www.mozilla.org or an organization-wide events system)
- Match new contributors with tasks and teams appropriate to their skills and interests (such as a task board or a tool to help contributors find bugs)
- Provide visibility into the activities contributors are involved in (such as a contribution logger or a dashboard)
- Recognize people for their contribution to the project (such as a badging system or a profile management system)
This does not include tools that:
- Serve the needs of just one functional area (such as a localization workflow tool)
- Serve as a platform for interacting with an audience other than new and active contributors (such as a product site, a blog aggregator or an affiliate marketing program)
- Would be required by Mozilla even in the absence of a vibrant contributor community (such as a bug tracker or a customer support website)
Connecting with and relating to contributors is an effort that enjoys broad support across Mozilla. But the tools we currently depend on to connect with and relate to Mozilla’s contributors are fragmented. As a result:
- We do not undertake tools efforts according to a unified strategy
- We do not measure the value or impact of these efforts in any comprehensive way
- We do not take advantage of the efficiencies or provide the cohesive experiences that shared technologies, data, processes and resources could deliver
The Contributor Tools program will address these problems by unifying various tools efforts in a single program, creating a new structure for strategy, measurement and performance.
The stakeholders for these tools include the staff and volunteers actively involved with building communities around their projects and the contributors who devote effort to furthering Mozilla’s mission. These stakeholders are represented by the Systems and Data Working Group of the Community Builders team.
The Systems and Data Working Group will meet regularly to establish decision-making structures for the program, set requirements for each system, create criteria of success for the program and advocate for and secure resources for those initiatives. In 2013 the group identified the systems required to complete Mozilla’s contributor tools suite.
The Contributor Tools program should optimally have enough resources to maintain existing systems (providing security and stability fixes but few enhancements) while undertaking one major new effort at a time (such as building a new platform or redesigning an existing platform). This would require a small team of implementation staff plus the option to bring on contractors for burst efforts.
The Web Productions team has successfully built a program similar to the Contributor Tools program to deliver continuous service and improvement on http://www.mozilla.org. That program is accountable to a group of stakeholders from around the organization who are represented by a product owner. The product owner works closely with a program manager who helps guide the efforts of a cross-functional implementation team including some dedicated staff, some shared staff, some contractors and some contributors.
Implementing a similar approach for the Contributor Tools program would mean identifying individuals to occupy all of those roles. The exact number of individuals would depend on the scope of the program’s accountability. Our initial analysis suggests that existing staff and contractors might be able to provide most or all of the resources initially needed by this program.
This program will also be able to gain additional leverage in two ways:
- Current community tools efforts are fragmented with teams building siloed functionality that could be extended to support the entire project (e.g. an events manager in reps.mozilla.org, contribution dashboards in support.mozilla.org). Numerous staff throughout the organization contribute, or are ready to contribute, to these fragmented efforts. Guiding their efforts with a unified strategy will allow for smarter allocation of existing resources.
- These tools will also serve as featured web development projects for new contributors. The program’s charter could include a mandate to maximize contributor involvement in system development.
The most minimal implementation of this program would require some realignment of product and engineering teams to cover the broader scope contemplated here:
- Product teams would drive products forward based on the priorities of the Systems and Data Working Group of the Community Building team.
- Implementation teams would shift between projects as necessary to achieve the program’s vision.
This realignment would enable the program to undertake Contributor Tools efforts according to the priorities established by a broad coalition of stakeholders.
A more ambitious program implementation might also include:
- Adding a full-time Community Builder to the program team to maximize contributor involvement in product implementation.
- Enlisting engineers, designers and other implementation experts from elsewhere within the organization who are already working on this effort.
These additions would enable the program to develop new features more rapidly and/or support more systems. Furthermore, the full-time Community Builder’s role could be charged with establishing a model for other web projects to use, thereby increasing project capacity across the entire organization.